An Adaptive Functioning Evaluation focuses on everyday life skills such as communication, self-care, safety awareness, social skills, and independence. It examines how an individual manages daily routines in real-world settings, rather than only in structured testing situations. This type of evaluation is critical for understanding functional strengths and needs.

An ADHD Evaluation examines attention, organization, activity level, and impulse control to determine whether an individual meets criteria for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. The process typically includes interviews, questionnaires, developmental and academic history, and targeted cognitive and executive testing. The goal is to create a complete and accurate picture of attentional and executive functioning.

A Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP) is a personalized, written plan that outlines specific, positive strategies to reduce challenging behaviors and build more appropriate, helpful ones. It is developed based on the results of a Functional Behavior Assessment. The plan emphasizes teaching a person skills and adjusting environments, rather than relying solely on consequences.

A Comprehensive Autism Evaluation examines social communication, behavior patterns, sensory experiences, and developmental history to determine whether an individual may be on the autism spectrum. Gold-standard tools, careful observation, and in-depth interviews are used to develop a nuanced understanding of functioning. The evaluation is designed to be structured, respectful, and appropriately tailored to the person’s developmental level.

A Comprehensive Vocational Evaluation offers an in-depth look at a person’s work-related strengths, interests, aptitudes, and barriers. It often includes standardized tests, work samples, simulations, interviews, and review of educational and employment history. The evaluation aims to provide a realistic, detailed picture of vocational potential and needs.

A Competency To Stand Trial Evaluation assesses whether a defendant can understand the legal process and work with legal counsel in a meaningful way. It examines understanding of charges, courtroom roles, potential outcomes, and the ability to reason and make informed decisions. The impact of mental health or cognitive conditions on these abilities is also evaluated.

A Downward Departure Evaluation explores psychological, neuropsychological, and developmental factors that may support a request for a sentence below the usual guideline range. It focuses on the individual’s mental health, cognitive functioning, trauma history, and life circumstances. The purpose is to provide the court with a more complete clinical context, not to excuse behavior.

Mitigation Evaluations provide a comprehensive view of a person’s background, including developmental history, mental health, trauma, medical issues, neurocognitive functioning, and social environment. They are intended to help the court understand the broader context in which an offense occurred. Information from many sources is integrated into a coherent, clinically grounded narrative.

A Forensic Neuropsychological Evaluation examines cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning in the context of a specific legal question. It applies expertise in brain–behavior relationships to issues such as possible brain injury, capacity, competency, or functional impairment. The evaluation integrates test data with medical records, history, and collateral information.

In personal injury cases, a Forensic Neuropsychological Evaluation assesses cognitive and emotional changes following events such as traumatic brain injury, concussion, stroke, or other medical incidents. The focus is on how these changes affect everyday functioning and work capacity. Test data are interpreted in light of medical history, prior functioning, and other relevant information.

A Forensic Psychological Evaluation focuses on emotional, behavioral, and personality functioning in legal or court-related situations. It may address questions related to mental health diagnoses, psychological injury, risk, parenting capacity, or other issues relevant to criminal, civil, or family law. The process typically combines clinical interviews, standardized measures, and collatera

A Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA) is a structured process used to understand why a behavior is occurring. It examines what tends to happen before and after the behavior and how others respond. The goal is to identify the function of the behavior so that more effective, respectful strategies can be developed.

A General Intellectual (IQ) Evaluation measures key thinking skills such as reasoning, problem-solving, verbal abilities, working memory, and processing speed. It provides a clear understanding of overall intellectual functioning and cognitive strengths. This type of evaluation may stand alone or be incorporated into a broader assessment.

A Gifted Evaluation assesses advanced reasoning and learning abilities using standardized, age- appropriate tests. It clarifies whether a child meets criteria for gifted programming or may benefit from enrichment or academic acceleration. The evaluation also provides insight into the child’s cognitive profile and learning style.

A Neuropsychological Evaluation is a careful, in-depth assessment of how an individual’s brain is functioning in everyday life, including memory, attention, problem-solving, and emotional functioning. Through a series of standardized, evidence-based tests, clinicians develop a clear picture of cognitive strengths and areas of difficulty. The information gained is organized into a comprehensive, clinically meaningful profile.

A Personality And Emotional Evaluation explores patterns of mood, behavior, stress response, coping, and relating. Through interviews and standardized measures, it provides a deeper understanding of emotional functioning, relationships, and interpersonal style. This type of assessment highlights underlying dynamics that may not be immediately apparent in everyday life.

A Psychoeducational Evaluation clarifies how an individual best learns by examining thinking skills, academic abilities, and learning processes. It identifies areas of strength, as well as areas where additional support may be beneficial. This approach provides a compassionate, data- driven understanding of a person’s learning profile.

A Vocational Interest and Aptitude Evaluation helps clarify the types of careers and work environments in which an individual is most likely to thrive. It examines strengths, preferences, talents, and transferable skills through structured assessments and collaborative discussion. The process results in a more focused understanding of vocational direction.